SARS-CoV-2 Viral RNA Found in Breastmilk

CQ #201 – July 6, 2020
by Anne Eglash MD, IBCLC, FABM
#LACTFACT
SARS-CoV-2 RNA particles have been found in expressed breastmilk, but there is no evidence that the RNA represents viable viral particles.
British Medical Journal Pre-Printed before Peer Review, posted online 6/16/2020

What is the significance of a positive test for SARS-CoV-2 RNA in breastmilk?

As per the systematic review discussed on the last CQW #200, approximately 4% of newborns of mothers positive for SARS-CoV-2 have positive tests in the first few days of life. Despite this low percentage, some professional organizations still express concern about possible transmission of SARS-CoV-2 via breastfeeding.

Several studies have published case reports demonstrating the presence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA particles in breastmilk. The study for this week was conducted in the Los Angeles, CA region, and is among the better-designed studies regarding SARS-CoV-2 RNA in breastmilk. Between March 27 and May 6th, 2020, the researchers collected and analyzed 64 expressed breastmilk samples from 18 mothers who were SARS-CoV-2 positive, with 17/18 having had symptoms of illness. The women were given information on how to collect the breastmilk samples properly to prevent the risk of breastmilk contamination. Among the 64 samples of breastmilk, only one had detectable RNA of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Thirteen of the 18 children aged neonate-21 months had symptoms of COVID-19, but only 2 needed medical care.

The authors also ran a second and different study. They took breastmilk samples from healthy mothers and spiked them with living SARS-CoV-2 viral particles. They pasteurized the spiked milk samples to find out if the virus would survive pasteurization.

What happened, and what does all of this mean? Well, let’s see what you think first:

According to authors of this study, 1) what do you think are accurate statements regarding the effect of pasteurization of human milk spiked with SARS-CoV-2, and 2) what does it mean that a breastmilk sample from an ill mother has detectable SARS-CoV-2 RNA? Choose 1 or more:
  1. It is unclear if the SARS-CoV-2 positive breastmilk sample from the ill mother represented contamination from respiratory secretions, or whether the virus was shed via breastmilk.
  2. When the SARS-CoV-2 positive breastmilk from the ill mother was cultured, the researchers were unable to grow any living virus.
  3. Pasteurization of the spiked breastmilk from healthy mothers killed the virus.
  4. Even before pasteurizing the spiked breastmilk from healthy mothers, the researchers demonstrated that the breastmilk already killed the live virus.

See the Answer

Correct Answers: A, B, and C (not D)
British Medical Journal Pre-Printed before Peer Review, posted online 6/16/2020
Chambers CD, Krogstad P, Bertrand K, Contreras D, Tobin NH, Bode L, Aldrovandi GM

Abstract

There is no abstract for this article.

IABLE Comment by Anne Eglash MD, IBCLC, FABM

The researchers demonstrated that after they spiked the breastmilk from healthy volunteers with SARS-CoV-2 virus, they were able to grow the virus in culture, so breastmilk by itself has not been shown in this study to directly kill the virus. Pasteurization (heating the milk to 62° C for 30 minutes) did kill the virus.

There are a handful of other recently published studies showing SARS-CoV-2 viral RNA in breastmilk of mothers positive for SARS-CoV-2, whether the mothers had symptoms or not. The presence of viral RNA in breastmilk does not necessarily increase the infant’s risk of becoming ill with the virus. The infant is already exposed to mom’s respiratory secretions, which would be the main source of viral exposure. The presence of viral RNA in breastmilk does not mean that there are living viral particles that can infect the infant. The presence of RNA particles just means that there are protein snippets from the virus, but we don’t know that the virus is actually living and infectious. The authors were not able to grow the virus from the ill mothers’ milk that was positive for the viral RNA.

No studies thus far have demonstrated a positive culture, or growth of virus from breastmilk of infected mothers, and no studies have demonstrated that breastfed infants of mothers with who have a + RNA test for SARS-CoV-2 in their breastmilk are more apt to become deathly ill.

Comments (4)

    leana

    Thank you so much for all the LACTFACTs!! Please forgive my ignorance, but how does a virus from the mother enter milk in the breast? Is it the same principle as meds? A quick Google search show CORONA at 34 000 Daltons. Would this mean it is toooo heavy to ever be able to enter milk in the breast or to big (at 60-140nm) to go through para-cellular pathways in early days before epithelial cell swell? I have no idea how big those gaps are. Thank you in advance!

    Anne Eglash

    Great Question!Perhaps the lymphatic system. Here is an article that discusses how viruses spread in the body. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7173411/pdf/main.pdf

    Veronica Schaedler

    Such an important study – thank you for publishing this it really gave me confidence with recommended DBM and breastfeeding.

    Katie

    So basically this answers my original question…
    Did anyone try squirting a little bit of breastmilk on 2020?

Leave a Comment
Comments are moderated
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Comments are closed for this question.